In This Article
His Story
On the morning of April 19, 1775, an enslaved Black man named Prince Estabrook stood among the Lexington militiamen confronting British regulars on the town common. When gunfire broke out, Estabrook was wounded. His name subsequently appeared in a published list of Americans injured during the opening fighting of the Revolutionary War.
Estabrook’s presence at Lexington is one of the most consequential surviving records of Black participation in the Revolution’s first military confrontation. He was not a free citizen enjoying the political rights claimed by many of the colonists. He was enslaved by Benjamin Estabrook, a Lexington resident whose household and property depended in part upon unfree labor.
Nevertheless, Prince responded with Captain John Parker’s militia as British troops approached Lexington. The surviving evidence places him among the Americans wounded in the brief encounter that helped transform the colonial political crisis into open warfare.
His military career did not end with that wound. Over the next eight years, Estabrook served in several Massachusetts militia and Continental Army formations. Military rolls connect him with Fort Ticonderoga, Cambridge, and Continental encampments in New York and New Jersey.
By the time the Revolutionary War ended, Estabrook had gained his freedom, although the precise circumstances of his emancipation remain uncertain. He returned to Lexington and later moved to Ashby, Massachusetts, where family tradition places his death around 1830.
His life reveals a fundamental contradiction within the American Revolution. Estabrook fought for a movement that proclaimed liberty while he himself was held in slavery. His subsequent military service, freedom, and eventual public commemoration make his story an important part of the history of the Revolution and of Black Americans in the founding generation.
Early Life
Prince Estabrook was probably born around 1740 or 1741, most likely in Lexington, Massachusetts. His approximate birth year is reconstructed from ages recorded on later military descriptive rolls rather than from a surviving birth certificate.
He was enslaved by Benjamin Estabrook, a Lexington farmer and gristmill operator whose property lay east of the town center. The Estabrook family held land near the road connecting Cambridge and Concord, in the vicinity of Vine Brook.
National Park Service research suggests that Prince may have been the son of Tony, another enslaved man associated with the Estabrook family. This relationship remains a historical possibility rather than a firmly established parent-child connection.
Very little documentation survives concerning Prince’s childhood, education, or daily labor. His circumstances were shaped by slavery in colonial Massachusetts, where enslaved people worked in farming households, domestic service, trades, and other occupations.
Slavery and the Massachusetts Militia
Massachusetts militia regulations imposed racial restrictions on ordinary military training. Black and Indigenous men were generally excluded from regular militia drilling, although able-bodied men could still be required to respond during emergencies.
This distinction helps explain Estabrook’s presence with the Lexington militia on April 19, 1775. His participation did not mean that he possessed the same legal status or civic privileges as the white men standing alongside him.
By the spring of 1775, colonial resistance to British imperial policies had reached a crisis. British troops stationed in Boston were preparing an expedition into the countryside to seize military supplies, while local militia companies were organizing to resist possible intervention.
Revolutionary War Service
Captain John Parker’s Lexington Militia
During the night of April 18–19, 1775, riders and local alarm networks warned Massachusetts communities that British regulars were advancing from Boston toward Concord.
Captain John Parker assembled Lexington’s militia. Prince Estabrook was among the men who responded.
As British troops approached the town common shortly after dawn, Parker’s men confronted a much larger regular force. The encounter escalated into gunfire, leaving several Lexington militiamen dead and others wounded.
Estabrook was wounded in the left shoulder. A contemporary list of American casualties included his name, making his presence in the fighting unusually well documented.
Later historical research states that Joseph Estabrook, a member of Benjamin Estabrook’s family, assisted wounded men, including Prince, and that Dr. Joseph Fiske treated them at the Estabrook home.
Recovery and Additional Service in 1775
Estabrook recovered sufficiently to return to military duty. Massachusetts records associate him with a short period of service at Cambridge in June 1775 under orders from the Committee of Safety.
The surviving evidence does not establish that he fought at the Battle of Bunker Hill on June 17. His recorded Cambridge service should therefore not be treated as proof of participation in that engagement.
Service at Fort Ticonderoga
In 1776, Estabrook served in Captain Charles Miles’s company of Colonel Jonathan Reed’s regiment.
The regiment was assigned to the northern theater, where American forces sought to defend the Lake Champlain corridor against British advances from Canada.
Records place his unit at Fort Ticonderoga. A February 1777 pay abstract and travel allowance document his return from the northern post.
Colonel Eleazer Brooks’s Regiment
On November 6, 1777, Estabrook entered another period of service, this time in Captain Simon Hunt’s company of Colonel Eleazer Brooks’s militia regiment.
The company was stationed at Cambridge. Estabrook was discharged on April 3, 1778, after nearly five months.
Continental Army Service, 1780–1781
Estabrook entered a further period of service on July 28, 1780, in Colonel John Greaton’s Third Massachusetts Regiment.
A descriptive roll from this enlistment identified him as a Black man, approximately thirty-nine years old, and recorded his height as five feet eleven inches.
He arrived at Springfield, Massachusetts, in early August and subsequently served with Continental forces farther south.
Military records place him on duty at Camp Orangetown in New York in October 1780 and at Camp Totowa, New Jersey, later that month.
He was discharged from this period of service on April 7, 1781.
His Final Continental Enlistment
On June 11, 1781, Estabrook received a bounty from Lexington for agreeing to serve a three-year term in the Continental Army. He was formally engaged the following day.
A descriptive roll identified his occupation as farmer, with black hair and black eyes. It also recorded his age as forty and his height as five feet six inches.
The difference between the heights recorded in 1780 and 1781 is an unresolved discrepancy in the surviving documentation.
In 1782, Estabrook appeared in Captain Joseph Williams’s company of Colonel John Greaton’s regiment. By 1783, he was serving in Colonel Michael Jackson’s regiment.
His final known muster roll is dated October 14, 1783, near the conclusion of the Revolutionary War.
Battles and Campaigns
Battle of Lexington
The Battle of Lexington was the first armed confrontation between British regular troops and colonial militia during the military phase of the American Revolution.
British commanders had dispatched an expedition from Boston toward Concord to seize colonial military stores. Colonial warning networks spread news of the movement, and militia companies gathered along the route.
At Lexington, Captain John Parker’s militia faced a much larger British advance force. The Americans were outnumbered, and the confrontation lasted only a short time. Gunfire killed eight Lexington militiamen and wounded others.
The British continued toward Concord, where additional fighting occurred. Their return march to Boston became a prolonged engagement as colonial militia attacked along the road.
Prince Estabrook’s participation is supported by a contemporary casualty list identifying him among the wounded of Lexington. Reverend Jonas Clarke, who witnessed the events, also identified a Black man named Prince among those wounded in his 1776 commemorative sermon.
Participation: Confirmed by contemporary casualty documentation and near-contemporary eyewitness testimony.
Source: Reverend Jonas Clarke, 1776 sermon, page 28; contemporary provincial casualty list; National Park Service biography.
The Defense of Fort Ticonderoga and the Lake Champlain Corridor
Following the failure of the American invasion of Canada, Fort Ticonderoga became a critical defensive position protecting the approaches from British-held Canada into the Hudson Valley.
American commanders reinforced the fort and the surrounding defenses while naval forces under Benedict Arnold attempted to delay British movement along Lake Champlain.
In October 1776, Arnold’s small American fleet fought British forces at the Battle of Valcour Island. Although the British gained control of the lake, the campaign delayed a larger invasion until the following year.
Prince Estabrook served in Colonel Jonathan Reed’s regiment, which was stationed at Ticonderoga during this period. His service is supported by Massachusetts military records and a February 1777 travel allowance.
There is no evidence presently identified that Estabrook personally fought aboard Arnold’s vessels at Valcour Island.
Participation: Documented service at Fort Ticonderoga; individual participation in the naval battle not established.
Continental Army Operations in New York and New Jersey
By 1780, the Revolutionary War had become a prolonged struggle involving British forces in New York, American Continental troops, state militias, and allied French forces.
The Continental Army maintained encampments and defensive positions in the Hudson Valley and northern New Jersey while General George Washington sought opportunities to challenge British control of New York City.
Estabrook’s military records place him on duty at Camp Orangetown in October 1780. Later that month, he passed muster at Camp Totowa under Brigadier General John Paterson.
These entries establish his presence with Continental forces during the campaign season, but they do not identify his participation in a particular battle.
Participation: Confirmed in military duty and muster records; no individual battlefield engagement established.
Final Continental Army Service
During the closing years of the Revolution, the Continental Army continued to maintain its regiments even as the war’s strategic balance shifted following the American and French victory at Yorktown in October 1781.
British forces remained in important positions, including New York City, until the peace settlement and final evacuation in 1783.
Estabrook’s records place him in Colonel John Greaton’s regiment in 1782 and Colonel Michael Jackson’s regiment in 1783.
His final recorded muster in October 1783 demonstrates that his service extended into the final months of the war.
Participation: Documented regimental service; specific battle participation not established.
Military Honors and Recognition
Prince Estabrook’s military service received formal public recognition long after his death.
In September 1930, a government veteran’s headstone was dedicated at the burial site traditionally associated with him in Ashby, Massachusetts.
The marker was provided through the United States War Department, reflecting federal recognition of his Revolutionary War service.
In 2008, a memorial honoring Estabrook and other Black Patriots was installed near Buckman Tavern in Lexington, close to the site where he had fought and been wounded in 1775.
The memorial emphasizes the participation of Black soldiers whose contributions were often overlooked in traditional accounts of the Revolution.
These twentieth- and twenty-first-century commemorations should be distinguished from military decorations awarded during Estabrook’s lifetime. No separate wartime decoration has been established.
Original Military Records
Prince Estabrook’s service can be reconstructed through a series of Massachusetts military rolls, pay abstracts, and Continental Army records.
Lexington Casualty List
Date: 1775
A contemporary list of Americans killed and wounded during the April 19 fighting identifies Prince Estabrook, using the spelling Easterbrooks, among the wounded of Lexington.
This is among the strongest surviving sources establishing his presence in the battle.
Fort Ticonderoga Service Records
Period: 1776–1777
Massachusetts records identify Estabrook in Captain Charles Miles’s company of Colonel Jonathan Reed’s regiment.
A February 1777 pay abstract documents his travel allowance for returning from Ticonderoga.
Cambridge Militia Service
Period: November 6, 1777 – April 3, 1778
Records identify Estabrook in Captain Simon Hunt’s company of Colonel Eleazer Brooks’s regiment, stationed at Cambridge.
1780 Descriptive Roll
Enlistment: July 28, 1780
The record identifies Estabrook as approximately thirty-nine years old and five feet eleven inches tall, serving for Lexington.
The roll provides important evidence of his identity and military assignment.
1781 Descriptive Roll
Enlistment: June 12, 1781
This document identifies Estabrook as approximately forty years old, five feet six inches tall, with black hair and black eyes. His occupation was recorded as farmer.
The recorded height conflicts with the earlier descriptive roll.
Final Muster Roll
Date: October 14, 1783
Estabrook appears in military documentation associated with Colonel Michael Jackson’s regiment.
The record establishes his continued military service near the end of the Revolution.
Original Military Documents
Reverend Jonas Clarke’s 1776 Account
Reverend Jonas Clarke, the Lexington minister who witnessed the events of April 19, 1775, published a commemorative sermon the following year.
His account identified Prince among the wounded residents of Lexington. The passage is important because it was published only one year after the fighting and provides evidence independent of later family traditions.
Source: Jonas Clarke, commemorative sermon delivered April 19, 1776, page 28.
This is a summary of the historical document, not a verbatim transcription.
Military Descriptive Rolls, 1780 and 1781
Estabrook’s descriptive rolls recorded his age, physical appearance, occupation, and the town for which he enlisted.
These documents are especially important because they demonstrate that he continued serving well after his initial wound at Lexington.
They also preserve conflicting height measurements, illustrating why original military documents must be evaluated individually rather than silently reconciled.
Source: Massachusetts Soldiers and Sailors of the Revolutionary War, Volume V, pages 155–157 and 389–392.
No verified first-person memoir or pension declaration by Prince Estabrook has been identified in the sources reviewed for this biography. Consequently, his thoughts, personal motivations, and experiences cannot be reconstructed in his own words.
Military Service Record
| Conflict | American Revolutionary War |
|---|---|
| Allegiance | American Patriot forces |
| Branch | Massachusetts militia; Continental Army |
| Rank | Private |
| Initial Commander | Captain John Parker |
| Initial Battle | Lexington, April 19, 1775 |
| Wound | Left shoulder, April 19, 1775 |
| 1776–1777 | Captain Charles Miles; Colonel Jonathan Reed; Ticonderoga |
| 1777–1778 | Captain Simon Hunt; Colonel Eleazer Brooks; Cambridge |
| 1780–1781 | Colonel John Greaton; Continental service |
| 1782 | Captain Joseph Williams; Colonel John Greaton |
| 1783 | Colonel Michael Jackson |
| Final Known Muster | October 14, 1783 |
| Pension | No individual pension file verified |
| Principal Records | Massachusetts military rolls and Continental Army muster records |
Later Life and Burial
Following the end of the Revolutionary War, Prince Estabrook returned to Lexington, Massachusetts.
By this period, he had become a free man, although historians have not established the precise circumstances of his emancipation.
Massachusetts slavery declined rapidly following the state’s 1780 constitution and the judicial decisions of the early 1780s that made slavery legally unenforceable.
Tax records from 1790 identified a free nonwhite man in Benjamin Estabrook’s household. Prince’s own name appeared on later Lexington tax rolls, although the records do not establish him as a property owner.
Later family accounts indicate that he continued working for the Estabrook family after gaining his freedom.
His Move to Ashby
Around the beginning of the nineteenth century, Prince moved to Ashby, Massachusetts, where Benjamin Estabrook’s son Nathan maintained a household.
Later historical accounts indicate that Prince lived in Ashby for the remainder of his life.
He reportedly died around 1830, at approximately ninety years of age.
Burial and the 1930 Headstone
Historical tradition identifies Prince Estabrook’s burial in the Old Burial Ground associated with Ashby’s First Parish congregation.
A government headstone was dedicated there on September 12, 1930, approximately a century after his reported death.
The marker commemorates his Revolutionary War service. Because it was erected long after his death, it should not be mistaken for an original nineteenth-century gravestone.
His exact original grave location and the circumstances of his burial depend upon later accounts rather than a contemporary burial register examined for this article.
Family History
The Yost Post · Family DirectoryPrince Estabrook’s family history remains considerably less documented than his military career.
The surviving sources identify his association with the Estabrook household in Lexington and later with Nathan Estabrook’s household in Ashby. These relationships were shaped by slavery, employment, and household residence, and they must not be confused with proven biological kinship.
Family Name & Heritage Estabrook Explore surname origins and meaning
Historical Origin
The surname Estabrook is associated with English naming traditions and appears in early New England colonial records.
The name is generally understood as a variant of Eastbrook, a geographical surname associated with a brook or stream.
The Estabrook Name in Colonial Massachusetts
Members of the Estabrook family settled in Massachusetts during the colonial period and became associated with communities including Lexington.
Prince bore the surname of the family that enslaved him. This does not establish biological descent from that family or demonstrate that his ancestors originally used the name Estabrook.
His birth surname, if different, has not been established.
Genealogical distinction: A surname associated with enslavement should not be interpreted as proof of biological ancestry or ethnic origin.
His Parents
National Park Service research suggests that Prince may have been the son of an enslaved man named Tony, associated with the Estabrook family.
View Additional Research
The relationship remains unconfirmed. No original birth or parentage record establishing Tony as Prince’s father has been identified.
No reliable record identifying Prince Estabrook’s mother has been located in the materials reviewed.
View Additional Research
Additional household, probate, and local records may contain information about enslaved women associated with the Estabrook family, but none has been established as Prince’s mother.
His Grandparents and Earlier Ancestors
No paternal or maternal grandparents have been securely identified. Prince’s association with the Estabrook surname does not establish ancestry within the white Estabrook family.
Without original evidence of his parentage, earlier generations cannot be reconstructed reliably.
The Estabrook Household
Lexington resident who enslaved Prince during the colonial period and the opening years of the Revolution.
View Additional Research
Lexington Household
Benjamin’s household was located east of Lexington center, near Vine Brook.
Later Association
Later accounts indicate that Prince continued to reside or work in the household after becoming free.
This association was shaped by enslavement and subsequent employment or residence. It does not establish a biological relationship.
Benjamin Estabrook’s son, with whose household Prince became associated after moving to Ashby.
View Additional Research
Move to Ashby
Later family accounts place Prince in Nathan’s household around 1800 or shortly afterward.
Relationship
This was a household relationship, not a documented parent-child relationship.
His Marriage
The evidence concerning Prince Estabrook’s marriage is conflicting. An early twentieth-century Lexington historical reference states that he was married but does not identify a wife.
More recent historical summaries emphasize that no reliable evidence has established the identity of a spouse.
Accordingly, no wife can presently be named with confidence.
His Children
No children have been securely identified from the surviving evidence reviewed for this biography.
The absence of identified children should not be interpreted as proof that Prince had none. It means that no parent-child relationship can currently be established with sufficient documentary support.
Siblings and Extended Family
No brothers, sisters, or other biological relatives have been securely identified from the records examined.
Descendants
No verified line of descendants has been established. Claims of descent would require evidence connecting each generation through original or reliable genealogical records.
Family Research Update
Prince Estabrook’s military service is supported by several surviving official records, but his family history is largely undocumented.
Future research should focus on Lexington probate records, Estabrook household papers, tax records, and early Ashby records that might reveal additional information about his parentage, emancipation, marriage, or descendants.
Any future identification of relatives should distinguish biological kinship from relationships created through slavery, household residence, or employment.
Original Sources
The following sources include contemporary evidence, published military record transcriptions, and later historical research. They should not all be treated as having equal evidentiary weight.
-
Reverend Jonas Clarke — Commemorative Sermon, 1776
The Fate of Blood-Thirsty Oppressors, and God’s Tender Care of His Distressed People. Delivered at Lexington, April 19, 1776, page 28. Identifies Prince among the wounded.
-
Contemporary Provincial Casualty List, April 1775
List of Americans killed and wounded in the fighting at Lexington and Concord. Identifies Prince Easterbrooks among the wounded of Lexington.
Discussed and reproduced in National Park Service research.
National Park Service -
Massachusetts Soldiers and Sailors of the Revolutionary War
Volume V, pages 155–157 and 389–392. Published compilation of Massachusetts military records documenting Estabrook’s service, enlistments, and descriptive rolls.
-
Continental Army Muster and Duty Records
National Archives, Revolutionary War rolls and compiled records. Research references include M881, Roll 422, frames 978–983, as cited in the National Park Service study.
View NPS Record References -
George Quintal Jr. — Patriots of Color
National Park Service historical research, 2004. Documents the military service of Black and Indigenous Patriots during the opening fighting of the Revolution and subsequent campaigns.
View National Park Service Study -
National Park Service — Prince Estabrook of Lexington
Detailed biography and military chronology, including original-document citations, slavery, emancipation, and burial traditions.
View Biography -
Alice M. Hinkle — Prince Estabrook: Slave and Soldier
Published 2001 by Pleasant Mountain Press. Specialized historical study of Prince Estabrook and the Estabrook family.
-
Proceedings of the Lexington Historical Society
Volume II, page 195, and Volume IV (1912), page 54. Historical references concerning Estabrook’s life and possible marriage.
-
American Battlefield Trust — Prince Estabrook
Historical biography summarizing his Revolutionary War service, emancipation, and later commemoration.
View Biography -
Freedom’s Way National Heritage Area — Prince Estabrook Memorial
Documentation concerning the Lexington memorial dedicated in 2008.
View Memorial History
Historical Research Note
Birth: The date around 1740 or 1741 is reconstructed from military age records. No exact birth date has been established.
Enslavement: Prince Estabrook was enslaved by Benjamin Estabrook during the opening years of the Revolution. The surviving record does not establish the full circumstances of his childhood or labor.
Lexington: His presence and wounding on April 19, 1775, are supported by contemporary casualty documentation and Reverend Jonas Clarke’s near-contemporary account.
Military Service: Massachusetts rolls document successive enlistments through 1783. The record supports service in particular units and locations but not participation in every engagement associated with those units.
Physical Description: The 1780 and 1781 descriptive rolls give different heights. Both measurements are preserved as recorded rather than silently reconciled.
Emancipation: Estabrook was free by the postwar period, but no specific manumission document or exact date of emancipation has been verified.
Pension: No individual Revolutionary War pension application has been verified. No pension number or payment amount is assigned to him in this biography.
Family: His possible father Tony remains unconfirmed. His spouse and children, if any, have not been reliably identified.
Death: The year 1830 and approximate age of ninety are based upon later historical and family accounts rather than a contemporary death certificate examined for this article.
Burial: The Ashby burial identification is supported by later historical tradition and a government marker erected in 1930. The marker is not a contemporary gravestone.
Portrait Disclosure: The accompanying portrait is an AI-generated historical interpretation, not an authenticated contemporary likeness of Prince Estabrook.
Genealogical Research Note
Prince Estabrook’s biography is supported by military records, contemporary accounts of Lexington, published historical research, and later commemorative sources.
The available documentation provides an unusually strong record of his Revolutionary War service but only limited evidence of his private life.
Future genealogical research should distinguish documented household associations from biological relationships and should avoid assigning spouses, children, or ancestors without adequate evidence.
The Yost Post presents this biography as an evidence-based historical resource and encourages readers to consult original records when conducting additional research.